Black information Link:

home campaigns act now policy & research press releases links subscribe contact us

black information link The 1990 Trust, human rights for race equality
The 1990 Trust's independent community website for black communities

SECTIONS
2007 Bicentenary of Abolition
America at war
Armed Forces
Arts&Culture
Black Elders
Black Workers
Blink Interview
Broadband
Business
Campaigns
Children
Civil Liberties
Crime & Policing
Disability
Education
Employment
Events
Government
Health
Human Rights
IT
Immigration
International
Ireland
Jobs
Legal
Links
Linux
News Digest
Northern Ireland
People
Politics
Religion
Reparations
Reports
Rural racism
Scotland
Society & Environment
Sports
Stephen Lawrence
The 1990 Trust
UK regions
WCAR
Wales
Women
Youth

Lib Dems hold key but which way will they turn?

by Lester Holloway
9/12/2005

CHARLES KENNEDY'S Lib Dems hold the key to the government recognising race in the new equality super-body.

Stumbling block: Lord Anthony Lester QC
Stumbling block: Lord Anthony Lester (above) is “bored” with demands for a race committee

Government sources have privately indicated they are willing to respond to growing pressure for black representation within the proposed Commission for Equality and Human Rights (CEHR).

But ministers are only likely to peform a u-turn if the Liberal Democrats soften their stance and not oppose plans to include a race committee as part of the new single equalities body.

In October Lib Dem peer Lord Anthony Lester opposed amendments put forward by former CRE chairman Lord Herman Ouseley for a CEHR race committee.

The government, which has been battered by recent defeats in the upper house, is unlikely to risk a further loss over the question of black representation.

Following pressure from race campaigners and Labour MP Diane Abbott Blink has learnt that ministers would now back a backbench amendment in the Lords if Charles Kennedy's party supports it.

betrayal

The Lib Dem leader has told Simon Woolley of Operation Black Vote that he is “supportive” of calls for a CEHR race committee and race commissioners on the board.

Charles Kennedy
Charles Kennedy: he holds the key to black representation in the single equalities body.

But Mr Kennedy will have to convince Lord Lester QC, who is against what he terms the “Balkanisation” of the single equalities body.

Lib Dem party president Simon Hughes and Mr Kennedy will not want to be seen as the politicians who denied race representation to Britain's black communities in the new body.

Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP Ms Abbott has blasted the present plans as “a betrayal of the black community… which is taking race relations back 30 years.”

It is understood that assistant whip Parmjit Dhanda, who helped represent the government on the Equality Bill standing committee, is keen to see race recognised in the CEHR's structure.

Gloucester MP Mr Dhanda is believed to have spoken to equality minister Meg Munn over the issue. Newly-elected Labour MP for Tooting Sadiq Khan is in favour of a race committee.

boring

Mr Kennedy is believed to have said he was “agreed in principle” to a race committee but would consult with key figures in his party before the Lib Dems officially changed their position.

Parmjit Dhanda
Government whip Parmjit Dhanda supports calls for a race committee in the single equalities body.

Lib Dem Lord Lester said he would be “astonished” if the government softened their stance.

He said talk about a race committee was “the most boring subject in the entire world.”

“It's for the new commission to decide its committee structure when it's in place.

“It's important they appoint first class people who are independent; know what they're doing and have professional expertise.”

Race and other equalities subjects covered by CEHR needed to be tackled “within the mainstream, not sidelined”, he added.

Senior Lib Dem peer Lord Navnit Dholakia said he hoped the single equalities body would give “particular emphasis” to tackling racism but did not want to be “prescriptive” about what committees it should have.

difference

Dr Evan Harris, the Lib Dems human rights spokesman, said: “I think it is extremely unlikely that the commission would not have proper representation from ethnic minority communities.

“But they were never meant to be representatives and I don't think it's appropriate to denote one commissioner to be this, and one commissioner to be that.”

Race campaigners such as OBV disagree, claiming that the experience of local government shows that equality mergers push race down the agenda.

The new body will see the Commission for Racial Equality axed and merged with the current commissions covering disability and gender, and with the new areas of sexual orientation, age, religion and human rights.

The 1990 Trust has argued that combining all subjects together in an “equalities mush” would be a serious and regressive step backwards on race equality.

unprecedented

In a letter to BME MP's and those MP's in seats with high black populations, Mr Woolley wrote: “The feeling amongst BME communities is unprecedented in favour of a statutory Race Committee.

“In fact a recent poll showed that 83% of those asked stated that the UK was still a racist society adds to the BME communities concern.”

In a letter to equality minister Ms Munn yesterday, Barbara Cohen of the Discrimination Law Association, wrote: “It is the view of the DLA that the CEHR would be a stronger and more effective body, with wider public support, if it were also required to establish committees for each of the other grounds covered by the equality enactments.

“The experience of the DLA informs our view that the CEHR should not function or attempt to function on the basis that ‘one size fits all’, as this is clearly not the case. Discrimination on different grounds is experienced differently, often takes different forms and can have different origins.”

Earlier this week race was the word that dare not speak its name in Westminster as MP's on the Equality Bill standing committee addressed virtually every area except race.

Amendments on topics ranging from the equalities implications of people with transgender status and sexual harassment in the workplace to the rights of the disabled to demand housing adaptions were discussed.

The only amendment dealing with race, proposed by the Conservatives, was rejected at the first committee session last week. Tories proposed a minimum of one CEHR board member for race and the other equalities subjects covered by the new body.

Send to a friend
Send to a friend
print document
Print document
Search

Government
London
Reports
Policing
Contact Government
Politics
Monarchy
CRE
Civil Service
Lords
Commons
Prisons
Single Equalities Commission
Citizenship & Integration

Related Stories

CRE turkeys vote for early Christmas Trevor's Rotten Empire UK needs a race-specific body Is this the man who destroyed the CRE? Trevor Phillips appointment as CEHR chairman condemned Trevor Phillips “to join the BNP soon” says mayor Ken Why we're rooting for Shami Batting both ways Fat cat Trevor won't fight for us Rights groups attack Blair's favourite for equality chair Phillips used me, says school experiment boy Equalities body will be a “discriminators charter” Trevor, do you qualify? CEHR chair “must have a record of fighting discrimination” PRESS RELEASE – Black communities reject Trevor Phillips for top equalities job Trevor Phillips would be “final nail in CEHR coffin” The 1990 Trust Response to The Equalities Review Interim Report Six days to influence review into government race policies Anti-racist organisations campaign for 'race committee' and Black representation on the CEHR Local race councils in revolt over merger United we stand Black groups abandon equalities super-body Trevor lobbies MPs for race committee Why we oppose the new Commission for Equality and Human Rights The moment of betrayal Let battle commence Vaz the way to do it Regions unite to demand race recognition in equalities body Sir Bill Morris blasts “one size fits all” agenda Lammy supports race committee for equalities super-body British Democracy failing Black Britain Charles Kennedy considering support for race committee MPs support for race committee grows Last chance to get race on single equalities agenda Jasper unleashed his wrath Lib Dems hold key but which way will they turn? Pump up the volume CEHR “a step backwards” says Diane Abbott Knowing is not believing Lobby MPs over absence of race in single equalities body proposals Upside down politics over single equality body Government shrug off concerns over all-white equality body A funny kind of equality Some more equal than others Time to sound alarm for equality Give us a piece of the pie Equalities merger body radically improved One Big Equality Mush Single equalities body still a dogs dinner Single equalities fudge fails to sweeten sceptics Single equalities body a 'dead duck' as disabilities group say no to merger Black community rejects single equalities merger CRE could survive single equalities merger CRE vote to kill off single equalities plans Trevor Phillips under pressure to oppose single equalities body Another former minister hits out at single equalities body Disappointment over White Paper on the single equalities body – no new powers or cash Government to impose single equalites body even if consultation opposes it Livingstone says single equalities body would be an ‘inaccessible monolith’ ‘Whitewash’ for single equalities body The Eagle has panned it – ex-race relations minister attacks single equalities body Single equalities body may not happen, says CRE chief Enforcement of equality law ‘off the agenda’ in single equalities Stitch-up claims over new single equalities body Squad to design new equalities commission lacks black grassroots credibility War of the equalities Big-guns blast single equalities body Opposition to single equalities body grows

Resources:

Teeth and their use

Improving Opportunity, Strengthening Society: One year On

The Zahid Mubarek Inquiry

pdf Dept. for Communities & Local Government Citizenship Survey

Responses to the Equalities Review Interim Report

The 1990 Trust Response to The Equalities Review Interim Report

Equalities Review Interim Report Briefing – Addressing Race Equality

pdf Our Rights, Our Future

pdf Improving Opportunity, Strengthening Society: The Government's race strategy

CRE response to DTI Statement on Commission for Equality and Human Rights

Equality and Diversity Forum welcomes the progress on a Commission for Equality and Human Rights

Summary of Changes to the CEHR

The 1990 Trust’s response to the CEHR White Paper

pdf Delivering equality and human rights for black and minority ethnic communities

Flush the academic racism in Blunkett’s office down the pan

Jacqui Smith answers questions on the Single Equalities Body

How to Contact your MP

Links:

Race and Faith and Communities

Election Memory

Catalyst Magazine

UNITE TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS: sign the statement against the erosion of civil liberties and human rights by new anti-terrorism proposals A Black Manifesto No 2 ID FREE FAROUQ PDP ASSOCIATES Power to the People

Published by The 1990 Trust

This website is subject to a disclaimer: Please read


Black Information Link. All rights reserved.

Suite 12 Winchester House 
9 Cranmer Road
London SW9 6EJ
Tel: 020  7582 1990
Fax: 020 7793 8269
Email: blink1990@blink.org.uk

top of pagetop of page

powered by Linux