Black information Link:

home campaigns act now policy & research press releases links subscribe contact us

black information link The 1990 Trust, human rights for race equality
The 1990 Trust's independent community website for black communities

SECTIONS
2007 Bicentenary of Abolition
America at war
Armed Forces
Arts&Culture
Black Elders
Black Workers
Blink Interview
Broadband
Business
Campaigns
Children
Civil Liberties
Crime & Policing
Disability
Education
Employment
Events
Government
Health
Human Rights
IT
Immigration
International
Ireland
Jobs
Legal
Links
Linux
News Digest
Northern Ireland
People
Politics
Religion
Reparations
Reports
Rural racism
Scotland
Society & Environment
Sports
Stephen Lawrence
The 1990 Trust
UK regions
WCAR
Wales
Women
Youth

Big-guns blast single equalities body

By Lester Holloway
30/10/2003

Some of the biggest names in race relations have blasted the government’s plans for the biggest ever shake-up for Britain’s equalities bodies.

Lord herman Ouseley
Lord Ouseley: ‘this new body is a fudge’

Lord Lester

Lord Lester: ‘independence not cronyism’.

Fears are increasing that the new single equalities body, officially announced today, could be a crony-filled PR-machine rather than a hard-hitting body that prosecutes organisations that discriminate.

Lord Herman Ouseley, former chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), expressed concern that the new single equalities body looked like it was geared up for promotional work, not law-enforcement.

Under government plans the CRE will be axed, in favour of merging it with the gender-specific Equal Opportunities Commission (EoC), and the Disability Rights Commission.

The new Commission for Equality and Human Rights will also cover religion, sexual orientation and age discrimination.

Speaking to blink.org, Lord Ouseley said: “From what I understand is going to be announced I think that this body is a fudge.

“If we’ve got legislation that isn’t capable of being enforced effectively because the body are busy doing promotional work, and are fudging their responsibilities under the law, then it won’t work.

“The vast majority of people who discriminate on grounds of whatever do so because they know they’re not going to be caught.

“I would think that a single equalities body has to be clear that it will get on and get after those people who are discriminating, and not be bogged down with promotional activity and campaigns.”

Criticism of the proposals from Lord Ouseley, who has a high level of respect for his work at the CRE, is sure to wound government who are known to be sensitive about criticism.

The changes were announced by government trade secretary Patricia Hewitt this morning in a written statement to Parliament, but carried very little detail about how the new single equalities commission is going to work.

Instead, a task force is to be set up to add meat on the bones of the announcement, which has been discussed in Whitehall circles for the last three years.

Hewitt has not agreed to interviews, and at present questions about the equality body’s independence and law enforcement powers remain unclear.

A DTI press release had ‘enforcing anti-discrimination legislation’ bottom of a list of six general priorities which includes promoting diversity and respect and delivering better services. However a DTI spokesman said: “I wouldn’t read anything into that.”

Lord Anthony Lester of Herne Hill told blink he was worried about cronyism in appointments to the new single equalities body.

The Liberal Democrat peer said: “It must be completely independent of government. Independence, independence, independence, not cronyism. It’s no use picking people who are ‘one-of-us’, Labour cronies.”

The single equalities body is believed to be enthusiastically supported by current CRE chairman Trevor Phillips and EoC chairwoman Julie Mellor.

The gender lobby is expected to be the biggest winners in the merger, with sources saying the EoC is “absolutely desperate” for the move to go ahead.

The new body will report to Hewitt, known as the most prominent advocate of women’s rights, but there are concerns that she has not been vocal enough on race equality.

Campaigners fear that race will slip down the agenda compared to other equalities subjects.

Milena Buyum, coordinator of the National Assembly Against Racism, said: “At local level every time race has been combined with other equalities issues, race has disappeared. The specialised approach disappears.

“You can’t mainstream equalities while your organisation is racist. You may say the right things publicly, but when it comes to changes it just won’t happen.”

In a statement today Hewitt said: “We consulted widely on how best to achieve our vision of a fairer, more inclusive and prosperous Britain and concluded that a single body to cover all equalities is an important step forward.”

The new body is expected to start work in 2006, when a European law called Article 13, comes into effect, which forces governments to provide discrimination protection for age, sexuality and religion.

Yesterday Simon Woolley, head of Operation Black Vote, said he believed the latest developments were a cost-cutting measure to save the government the expense of setting up new separate commissions and laws covering those subjects.

With so many different equalities areas, Lord Ouseley predicted ‘internal wars and people fighting for supremacy and positioning themselves’.

He also stressed the ‘absolute’ need for the body to be independent of government, but felt the government would probably ignore criticism.

Lord Lester – a key architect in the original 1976 Race Relations Act that created the CRE – revealed he had proposed a law this year to bring in a single equalities act, which was essential before a single equalities body could work. He said the government were ‘putting the cart before the horse’.

And he expressed disappointment that Labour voted it down in the Commons, despite the Bill getting approval from the Lords.

London Mayor Ken Livingstone is believed to oppose moves to axe the CRE and merge it into a single equalities body.

Lee Jasper, race advisor to the mayor, told blink.org: “The government’s proposals constitute a massive withdrawal from the principles set out in the Race Relations Act, and the Macpherson report.

“Robust enforcement of powers are absolutely critical. These proposals as they currently stand will result in a rise in racism and reduce the numbers of victims of discrimination being able to access support or redress.”

Experts believe the Disabilities Rights Commission (DRC) – which has only been in existence for three years – is more sceptical than the CRE or EoC. They are pushing hard for the ‘strand’ approach of keeping distinct sections specific to particular equalities areas within the new single equalities body.

Greater London Action for Disabilities also believe budgets should be ring-fenced for equalities areas, so the organisation’s priorities are not dominated by ‘the flavour of the day.’

see also:

Black think-tank says no to Single Equalities Commission

Opposition to single equalities body grows

DTI and DCA press release (DTI website)

Send to a friend
Send to a friend
print document
Print document
Search

Government
London
Reports
Policing
Contact Government
Politics
Monarchy
CRE
Civil Service
Lords
Commons
Prisons
Single Equalities Commission
Citizenship & Integration

Related Stories

CRE turkeys vote for early Christmas Trevor's Rotten Empire UK needs a race-specific body Is this the man who destroyed the CRE? Trevor Phillips appointment as CEHR chairman condemned Trevor Phillips “to join the BNP soon” says mayor Ken Why we're rooting for Shami Batting both ways Fat cat Trevor won't fight for us Rights groups attack Blair's favourite for equality chair Phillips used me, says school experiment boy Equalities body will be a “discriminators charter” Trevor, do you qualify? CEHR chair “must have a record of fighting discrimination” PRESS RELEASE – Black communities reject Trevor Phillips for top equalities job Trevor Phillips would be “final nail in CEHR coffin” The 1990 Trust Response to The Equalities Review Interim Report Six days to influence review into government race policies Anti-racist organisations campaign for 'race committee' and Black representation on the CEHR Local race councils in revolt over merger United we stand Black groups abandon equalities super-body Trevor lobbies MPs for race committee Why we oppose the new Commission for Equality and Human Rights The moment of betrayal Let battle commence Vaz the way to do it Regions unite to demand race recognition in equalities body Sir Bill Morris blasts “one size fits all” agenda Lammy supports race committee for equalities super-body British Democracy failing Black Britain Charles Kennedy considering support for race committee MPs support for race committee grows Last chance to get race on single equalities agenda Jasper unleashed his wrath Lib Dems hold key but which way will they turn? Pump up the volume CEHR “a step backwards” says Diane Abbott Knowing is not believing Lobby MPs over absence of race in single equalities body proposals Upside down politics over single equality body Government shrug off concerns over all-white equality body A funny kind of equality Some more equal than others Time to sound alarm for equality Give us a piece of the pie Equalities merger body radically improved One Big Equality Mush Single equalities body still a dogs dinner Single equalities fudge fails to sweeten sceptics Single equalities body a 'dead duck' as disabilities group say no to merger Black community rejects single equalities merger CRE could survive single equalities merger CRE vote to kill off single equalities plans Trevor Phillips under pressure to oppose single equalities body Another former minister hits out at single equalities body Disappointment over White Paper on the single equalities body – no new powers or cash Government to impose single equalites body even if consultation opposes it Livingstone says single equalities body would be an ‘inaccessible monolith’ ‘Whitewash’ for single equalities body The Eagle has panned it – ex-race relations minister attacks single equalities body Single equalities body may not happen, says CRE chief Enforcement of equality law ‘off the agenda’ in single equalities Stitch-up claims over new single equalities body Squad to design new equalities commission lacks black grassroots credibility War of the equalities Big-guns blast single equalities body Opposition to single equalities body grows

Resources:

Teeth and their use

Improving Opportunity, Strengthening Society: One year On

The Zahid Mubarek Inquiry

pdf Dept. for Communities & Local Government Citizenship Survey

Responses to the Equalities Review Interim Report

The 1990 Trust Response to The Equalities Review Interim Report

Equalities Review Interim Report Briefing – Addressing Race Equality

pdf Our Rights, Our Future

pdf Improving Opportunity, Strengthening Society: The Government's race strategy

CRE response to DTI Statement on Commission for Equality and Human Rights

Equality and Diversity Forum welcomes the progress on a Commission for Equality and Human Rights

Summary of Changes to the CEHR

The 1990 Trust’s response to the CEHR White Paper

pdf Delivering equality and human rights for black and minority ethnic communities

Flush the academic racism in Blunkett’s office down the pan

Jacqui Smith answers questions on the Single Equalities Body

How to Contact your MP

Links:

Race and Faith and Communities

Election Memory

Catalyst Magazine

UNITE TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS: sign the statement against the erosion of civil liberties and human rights by new anti-terrorism proposals A Black Manifesto No 2 ID FREE FAROUQ PDP ASSOCIATES Power to the People

Published by The 1990 Trust

This website is subject to a disclaimer: Please read


Black Information Link. All rights reserved.

Suite 12 Winchester House 
9 Cranmer Road
London SW9 6EJ
Tel: 020  7582 1990
Fax: 020 7793 8269
Email: blink1990@blink.org.uk

top of pagetop of page

powered by Linux